mapping.

i realize that we are supposed to post our responses to a particular map that was presented in class.

which to choose.. which to choose.

all had their strengths and flaws, but i think we were all a little numb.  most/maybe all of us thought that with a little more time, we could have turned in something great.  so we all ended up shooting for mediocrity.  sad, but probably true.  all the concepts were there, but most just weren't executed to their maximum capacity.  ah, well.

are we supposed to choose just one and discuss?  and can we choose our own? answers people, i ask and demand for answers.

-------------------------------------------
i now realize that we can describe and analyze our own map, but i've decided against it.

i think the map dealing with the stars was the most visually satisfying.  i appreciated the concept.  as we discussed in class, i think one constellation would have been interesting as well.  some were skeptical of the border, but i was fond of it.  the relations of everything were very interesting..  i found the 'key' to be helpful in trying to determine the purpose of the map, and i'm thankful i knew the theory behind the entire thing.  could see good collaboration.. overall well done.

two possible improvements:  make it entirely 2D.. and somehow include the Walker more.